In a strategic move to fortify its dedication to organizational credibility and profitability, ETHNOS, a leading cybersecurity entity in Nigeria, proudly announced its induction into the prestigious Society for Corporate Governance Nigeria (SCGN). This milestone reaffirms ETHNOS’ unwavering commitment to precision, integrity, and the highest standards of corporate governance.

The induction ceremony, held recently, witnessed the enthusiastic expression of Mr. Peter Ejiofor, CEO of ETHNOS. Mr. Ejiofor conveyed his elation, stating, “We are thrilled to share that Ethnos has become a proud member of the Society for Corporate Governance Nigeria…This induction mirrors our dedication to upholding excellence, governance, and ethical business practices.”May be an image of 4 people, dais and text that says "bersecurity and d to delivering The company uding Securit' Consultants ner Experience ion, ethics, uring the SE er decar ootprint a ech, Tele nission is any in e cybersı ነነ GS os cy NICERIA"

Underlining their meticulous approach to corporate governance, Mr. Ejiofor emphasized, “From financial accounts to recruitment and procurement, we consistently adhere to global best practices. Our adherence to these standards has positioned us as a qualified and chosen member of this esteemed society. Here’s to a future of triumphs!”

With a distinguished history spanning over two decades, ETHNOS has been a trailblazer in providing cutting-edge IT solutions and robust support services. Notably, their latest creation, the internationally recognized scanning software ‘Aquila,’ has garnered acclaim as a groundbreaking solution within the country. Tailored for software developers and FinTech firms, Aquila stands out for its efficacy in detecting vulnerabilities and breaches.

The induction of ETHNOS into the Society for Corporate Governance Nigeria comes at a pivotal moment, further solidifying their standing as a key player in the industry.

The Society for Corporate Governance Nigeria (SCGN) is a not-for-profit institution dedicated to advancing corporate governance best practices in Nigeria and across the continent. As the foremost advocate for these standards, SCGN remains committed to the development and propagation of corporate governance ideals.

 

Anthony Emeka Nwosu

 

 

 

“From financial accounts to recruitment and procurement, we consistently adhere to global best practices. Our adherence to these standards has positioned us as a qualified and chosen member of this esteemed society. Here’s to a future of triumphs!”

 

 

PwC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2022 revealed that 46% of organisations have experienced fraud, corruption, or other economic crimes in the last 24 months. Ryan Mer, CEO of eftsure Africa, a Know Your Payee™ (KYP) platform provider, gives a rundown of what to look out for.

 

  1. Fraud protection is no longer optional

It’s hard to believe today, but just a few years ago, even large organisations didn’t have payment fraud protection in place. One of our clients, a listed company, had an ongoing issue with payment fraud totalling over R3 million in losses in the year prior to adopting eftsure. They haven’t lost a cent to payment fraud since.

 

Businesses are taking the threat of payment fraud a lot more seriously than they did even two years ago. They’re acknowledging that the payment fraud risk is there and that it’s ubiquitous – not only large corporations and banks are being targeted anymore. They know they have to be protected in some way or another.

 

  1. It’s easier to hack people than to hack machines

Business email compromise (BEC) is a massive problem, even with protection in place. As threat protection becomes more sophisticated, fraudsters are targeting people to circumvent these digital security measures. There are numerous examples of bad actors manipulating various levels of staff. Although it may be tempting to believe only gullible individuals fall for scams, but criminals are often professional, persuasive and are well-trained in using human weakness, as well as individual and company information to their advantage.

 

Here’s a likely scenario: A client writes an online review of your company. A fraudster sees this and now knows this person or company is your client and that you would expect emails from them. They create a similar-looking fake email address, paste the client’s logo in their email, attach a malicious document, and send it to your company asking for clarification on the ‘attached invoice’. It takes one person on your team to open that attachment without double checking the sender’s details, and your company is compromised. This happens so easily when financial teams are under tremendous time pressure.

 

Email security really does help, but personnel training is crucial. Otherwise, it’s like having the best security at your house, from beams to alarms to fencing, and letting someone through the gate without checking their credentials.

 

  1. Manual processes are dangerous

The surprising result of increased digital fraud and BEC is that many companies opt to solve this problem by introducing more manual processes. They’re adding another person as a point of contact or another manager to oversee crucial checks. The problem is that it’s still a manual process, reliant on a person that can be manipulated, whether unwittingly or not. It’s a case of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Digital threats must instead be fought with digital solutions.

 

Another common mistake is to automate some processes but keep certain steps in that process manual. And ‘manual’ doesn’t necessarily mean physical documents but can involve adding extra steps to a process that could easily be automated. Onboarding new suppliers or clients is a great example: Many businesses have a platform for this, but then request certain documents via email. That’s an invitation for an interception, impersonation or malicious attachment. Or they’ll take data from the platform and manually perform processes and procedures on it, adding in a human element and the potential for mistakes. That’s not only counter-productive from a security perspective, but also a business perspective.

 

Luckily, we’re seeing the pendulum start to swing in the other direction. CFOs and CEOs, the executives responsible for processes, controls, operations and systems in the organisation, are starting to pay more attention to digitisation and automation. There’s a better understanding of these risks and benefits in general. After all, there is a lot of responsibility that sits on the shoulders of those responsible for outgoing payments in an organisation.

 

Onboarding, for example, is one of the first experiences someone will have with your company and should be as seamless and simple as possible. By using a platform that can digitise and automate the process, you can speed up the onboarding journey and collect all documents upfront, saving time for all parties involved. A digitised and controlled internal approval process that is automatically part of internal procedures increases business efficiencies and reduces wastage of productive time and energy that should be used to further the company, as manual labour is greatly reduced.

 

  1. Don’t just upgrade; integrate

The next step is to not only automate, but to integrate. Though our solution can be used as a standalone system, we’re seeing more clients integrating it into their existing systems.

 

A Software as a Service (SaaS) provider like eftsure can help enhance processes and limit payment fraud risks by providing an integrated onboarding, verified master data management and payment screening solution that cross-references the payments an organisation is about to release with a database of verified bank account details. This can be integrated into anything from ERP and accounting systems to sales and customer relationship management systems. The platform alerts you to any potentially compromised  payment details, at point of payment, allowing you to deal with the problem before the flow of funds has occurred.

 

The CFOs who are ahead of the digitisation curve, or further along in the process, are now looking for more integrated solutions. This cuts down on the number of steps in each process, and the time spent on each step – improving security while improving the bottom line. Even if they’re making these decisions for the sake of efficiency rather than security, it’s still a win on both fronts and at the end of the day, which stakeholder, with that huge responsibility of releasing payments on behalf of a company wouldn’t want peace of mind before releasing payments?