Paul Selibas appointed as EFTCorp’s Chief Product Officer to drive future-focused payment products

 

Africa’s digital payment ecosystem is growing rapidly, making innovative and scalable financial products essential for sustained growth.

 

But more doesn’t necessarily mean better, says Paul Selibas, newly appointed Chief Product Officer at EFT Corporation (EFTCorp). “Innovation is not just about building more products – it’s about solving real customer challenges and making payments more seamless, scalable, and accessible.”

 

Financial inclusion is a critical driver of economic growth across Africa, while 33% of adults in Sub-Saharan Africa have a mobile money account (compared to just 10% globally), more than half the population remains unbanked or underbanked, highlighting the necessity for products that promote financial inclusion and cater to the unique needs of African consumers.

 

With that in mind, Selibas plans to ensure that EFTCorp remains focused on its core product offerings while also driving innovation. “That means positioning EFTCorp’s products in a way that truly serves customers’ needs, balancing product focus with expansion.”

 

EFTCorp’s product strategy is built on four key pillars, all foundational to payments and financial services: Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS), acquiring, issuing, and payment orchestration. While one pillar might sometimes require more focus, all four are essential and will remain so, says Selibas. “Acquiring is currently gaining significant traction in the market, for example. However, acquiring alone is ineffective without issuing, which is why EFTCorp ensures both are supported together, enabling a comprehensive payment ecosystem. Unlike many fintechs focusing on individual products, EFTCorp is a full-suite payments solutions provider, offering end-to-end solutions through a modular approach. This allows clients to customise EFTCorp’s product offerings based on their needs rather than being locked into a single system.”

 

What truly sets the company apart, however, is its focus on further tailoring these solutions to regional requirements. “No-one understands a market better than its customers, so we work closely with our clients to ensure our products meet regulatory requirements and are customised to local needs. The key to this approach is maintaining a constant feedback loop with our clients and then using that ongoing communication for adaptation.

“This collaboration ensures we deliver relevant and effective solutions that solve real problems – not only in the broader African context, but down to the regional level. It means our product strategy consistently aligns with key challenges and opportunities in Africa, addressing issues like financial literacy, seamless and safe transacting, fragmented payment systems, and the high cost of infrastructure upgrades in traditional banking.”

EFTCorp also ensures that its products support financial inclusion by being price-sensitive and market-relevant. “Bringing high-cost systems into African markets is, quite simply, ineffective,” explains Selibas. “To be both accessible and impactful, solutions must consider socio-economic factors and local challenges. We aim to bridge the gap between legacy banking infrastructure and next-generation digital payment solutions, empowering financial institutions with scalable, seamless, and customer-centric products. These next-generation banking solutions also lower barriers to entry for underserved communities, allowing small businesses and merchants to integrate with digital payment systems effortlessly.”

 

With such a deep understanding of market-specific challenges, Selibas’ leadership will ensure that EFTCorp maintains its position as a trusted partner that builds for modern banking, developing tailored payment solutions for customers across Africa and accelerating the adoption of digital payments in emerging markets such as the DRC, Ethiopia, Kenya, Ghana, and broader East and West Africa. This includes driving growth in high-growth sectors such as e-commerce, merchant acquiring, card issuing and mobile transactions.

 

His strategy is to focus on tailoring his products by ensuring we have the best team so that innovation and customer needs are at the heart of what drives the company’s growth. “The ultimate goal is to help steer EFTCorp on its path to becoming the dominant payment enabler on the continent – not only leading the payments space but also empowering financial institutions and businesses to scale faster and smarter, and together, contributing meaningfully to Africa’s economy.”

 

The National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) is taking another bold step in shaping Nigeria’s digital future. Its Director General, Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, recently welcomed the Vice Chancellor of Nasarawa State University, Keffi (NSUK), Professor Sa’adatu Hassan Liman, to explore deeper collaboration in digital literacy, artificial intelligence (AI), and research.

For both leaders, this meeting wasn’t just about policy discussions—it was about creating real opportunities for students and researchers. Recognizing the need for hands-on skills and cutting-edge research, they agreed to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that will translate their shared vision into action.

“This partnership is about empowering young minds with the skills they need to thrive in a technology-driven world,” Abdullahi stated. “By working together, we can create a pipeline of digital talent that will drive innovation and economic growth.”

Professor Liman echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that universities must go beyond traditional learning to prepare students for the realities of a digital economy. “We want to ensure our students are not just degree holders but problem solvers and innovators,” she said.

The collaboration aligns with NITDA’s mission to accelerate Nigeria’s digital transformation, a key component of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda. With this partnership, students at NSUK can look forward to gaining future-ready skills that will set them apart in a competitive world.

 

By Babafemi Ojudu

I was startled when I saw the video clip that emerged from the Oval Office yesterday. It was a scene that should never have played out in any nation’s highest diplomatic chamber, let alone in the hallowed halls of the United States presidency. The Oval Office, a space traditionally reserved for measured statecraft and dignified engagement between nations, became the setting for an extraordinary display of public humiliation—an event that will go down as a dark moment in the annals of international diplomacy.

Watching that clip, I was reminded less of a formal diplomatic exchange than of the kind of public tirades one might expect from Portable, the notorious Nigerian musician infamous for berating his former collaborators, baby mamas, or anyone who crosses his path. Or worse, it felt like a street-corner altercation where a senior gang member bullies a subordinate into submission. This is not how states should relate. This is not how diplomacy is conducted. And I struggle to find any historical precedent for the sheer abrasiveness of what we witnessed.

The scene was not a discussion; it was a harangue—a coercive performance meant not to strengthen alliances but to humiliate an ally. It reminded me of my own encounters with security operatives in Nigeria in the 1990s—officials who, after an arrest, would gather around in numbers to badger, insult, and break the spirit of their captive under the guise of interrogation. When reason fails to persuade, they resort to threats, and when threats fail, they simply lock you up. In this case, Donald Trump and his co-conspirator in the public berating of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky stopped just short of calling for him to be carted off and detained in Guantanamo Bay.

This was not diplomacy; this was arm-twisting. Yes, stronger nations do apply pressure on weaker ones, but rarely in such a brazen and undignified manner. It was the kind of psychological bullying one might expect in a school dormitory, where a senior student torments a younger one to the point of breaking their self-esteem. Zelensky, a wartime leader navigating the existential survival of his nation, found himself subjected to a spectacle that reduced him from a visiting head of state to an object of scorn—ordered out of a meeting and forced to stand as his nation’s dignity was chipped away. One wonders how he truly felt in that moment—trapped, verbally battered by both the first and second most powerful figures in the United States. What was their objective? What was their calculation?

The practice of diplomacy is rooted in mutual respect, even among adversaries. Henry Kissinger, the master tactician of realpolitik, understood that power alone cannot sustain relationships—diplomacy is also about perception, negotiation, and maintaining equilibrium. The idea that a nation should treat its allies with dignity is a foundational principle in international relations—one I was taught in my master’s degree class at the University of Lagos. European leaders, from French President Emmanuel Macron to German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, have made clear that allies should not be pressured in such a crude manner. The EU’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has emphasized that diplomacy must be rooted in “strategic autonomy”—a term that, in this case, seems to have been completely disregarded.

The great theorists of diplomacy, from Hans Morgenthau to modern scholars of statecraft, recognize that the strength of a nation is not merely in its military or economic power but in its ability to build and sustain alliances. The United States, once seen as the paragon of global leadership, has set a dangerous precedent with this display. The world is watching, and the message it received was clear: the new age of diplomacy, at least in some quarters of Washington, is one of intimidation rather than persuasion, of humiliation rather than partnership.

One of the core tenets of Yoruba wisdom says, a kìí pa alejo eni ǹjàkin—you do not slaughter your guest and call it valor. Respect for visitors is deeply embedded in our culture, as it is in many others. The idea that a visiting head of state could be so publicly shamed, with cameras rolling, is an affront not just to Ukraine but to the very essence of diplomacy itself.

What happened in the Oval Office yesterday will not be forgotten anytime soon. Not by Ukraine, not by America’s allies, and certainly not by history.

Welcome to the new age of diplomacy—where might replaces right, where alliances are forged under duress, and where global leadership is measured not by wisdom but by the ability to humiliate.

The National Commissioner and CEO of the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC), Dr. Vincent Olatunji, has reaffirmed the Commission’s commitment to fostering compliance with data protection regulations across key national projects. This commitment was highlighted during a recent meeting with a delegation from the National Single Window (NSW) Secretariat, led by its Director, Mr. Tola Fakolade.

During the engagement, Mr. Fakolade provided an overview of the NSW Project, emphasizing its potential to streamline trade processes across Nigeria. He stated that the visit was aimed at seeking expert guidance from the NDPC to ensure full compliance with the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 (NDP Act), particularly as data privacy and security remain integral to the project’s successful implementation. Fakolade further initiated discussions on collaborative efforts between the NSW and the NDPC to embed data protection as a fundamental pillar of the project’s design and execution.May be an image of 11 people, table, newsroom and text

In response, Dr. Olatunji commended the NSW Secretariat for proactively engaging the Commission and recognizing the importance of data protection. He acknowledged that the NSW Project, once operational, would function as a Data Controller of Major Importance, necessitating strict adherence to data protection protocols. The NDPC boss shared insights on the organisational and technical measures required for data protection compliance and offered strategic guidance on steps to align the NSW initiative with the provisions of the NDP Act.

Highlighting the broader economic implications, Dr. Olatunji assured the NSW team of the Commission’s willingness to collaborate, noting that the project’s success would not only benefit Nigerians but also contribute significantly to the nation’s economic growth. To solidify their cooperation, both parties agreed to hold periodic meetings, with a dedicated team set up to advance discussions on data protection integration within the NSW framework.

The meeting underscores the NDPC’s commitment to championing privacy rights and ensuring that national projects align with global best practices in data protection and security.

#ChampioningPrivacyRights #DataProtection #NADPA2025

 

By Anna Collard, SVP Content Strategy & Evangelist at KnowBe4 Africa (www.KnowBe4.com

 

With growing cybersecurity concerns top of mind for many organisations this year, recognising the varying approaches that different generations have to digital safety is an important component of effective security cultures. Even though younger generations grew up in a hyperconnected world, their overconfidence and lax approach to cybersecurity precautions are potentially putting organisations at great risk.

According to a 2022-survey by Ernst & Young (EY) (https://apo-opa.co/3Q4Wnbx), almost half of Gen Z respondents (48%) say they take cybersecurity protection on their personal devices more seriously than on their work devices.The same survey found that Gen Z workers are far more likely than older employees to use the same password for professional and personal accounts and to ignore important IT updates.

Even though Gen Z (born between 1997 and 2012) and Gen Alpha (born after 2013) (https://apo-opa.co/3XbQeOX) have grown up on a steady diet of tablets, smartphones, and social media, their vast exposure to the digital world – and the confidence it’s brought about – makes them increasingly susceptible to cyber threats, particularly in the face of AI-powered attacks.

This vulnerability is evident from the fact that 72% admit to clicking on suspicious links at work (https://apo-opa.co/3CEoWtc), a figure that is far higher than that among older generations.

Gen Z’s elevated risk profile 

Unlike millennials and older generations, Gen Z and Gen Alpha have grown up in a fully connected world. Their awareness of technology is instinctive rather than learned – but this has both negative and positive side effects.

On the plus side, they may instinctively understand certain risks, but paradoxically are therefore less concerned about them, such as when it comes to sharing personal information. These younger adults exhibit a classic case of the Dunning-Kruger effect (https://apo-opa.co/3Ej2XIL): they overestimate their cybersecurity knowledge, while lacking the overall competence needed to recognise that they are, in fact, not proficient. This may make them resistant to training from older generations, whom they feel know less about technology than they do.

Because they’re more comfortable sending messages via social media, Gen Z and Gen Alpha are, for instance, more vulnerable to phishing emails. The EY survey found that despite being digital natives, only 31% of Gen Z-respondents actually feel confident in identifying phishing emails (https://apo-opa.co/3CEoWtc). In addition, their love of media-multitasking makes them more distracted and therefore more susceptible to social engineering threats.

Another risk is that younger employees tend to mix personal and work devices, increasing organisations’ exposure to security vulnerabilities. Moreover, digital-first employees may resist traditional security systems at work, viewing them as inefficient or unnecessary.

The key differences relating to cybersecurity to be aware of among various generations in the workplace are:

  • Millennials:
    • More cautious, as they witnessed the rise of the internet and early cybercrime.
    • Tend to follow traditional cybersecurity protocols, like password rotation and antivirus usage.
  • Gen Z/Alpha:
  • Exhibit more trust in tech solutions like password managers, but are less vigilant with manual precautions.
  • More reliant on AI-based protections and quick fixes, leading to assumptions that systems are inherently secure. ​

 

Building an intergenerational cybersecurity culture

Knowing younger generations’ different approaches to learning and technology can make it easier for cybersecurity training programmes to really work.

 

Forget old-school compliance training: standardised cybersecurity training might not connect well with Gen Z employees.

 

If you want to grab their attention, use gamified learning platforms to make training interactive and fun. Not only will they be more engaged, but you’ll be aligning the training with their tech-savvy nature and familiarity with social media, making it more impactful.

 

Gen Z and Alpha thrive on bite-sized content, being far more likely to consult TikTok to learn something new than consult their parents (https://apo-opa.co/3Er4exw). Organisations can take advantage of this by creating short, engaging, and mobile-friendly lessons that resonate with younger generations.

 

Another way to make cybersecurity risks hit home is by incorporating real-life examples into training sessions. Because younger employees may not fully understand the consequences of cyber risks, case studies are useful in pointing out the impact that cyberattacks can have on individuals and organisations, such as losing your job or costing the organisation millions of rands in damage.

 

Bridging this awareness gap can also be done by encouraging intergenerational collaboration at work. Younger employees can learn from the experience and insights of older workers while also providing great insights and wisdom by sharing their perspectives too. Mentorship and knowledge exchange programmes where experienced employees can guide but also listen and try to learn from the Gen Z workers will solidify your organisation’s cybersecurity culture. This bridge can also be crossed by encouraging collaborative learning. Younger employees are far more likely to embrace cybersecurity initiatives when they feel involved and their input is actively welcomed.

 

By tailoring cybersecurity training to the unique characteristics and preferences of each generation, organisations can create more effective and engaging programmes. In this way, workplaces can cultivate a culture of shared responsibility and ongoing improvement by empowering Gen Z with a sense of ownership and autonomy.

 

Governor Bala Mohammed Applauds President Tinubu On Good Governance

 

The Executive Vice Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI) Mr. Khalil Suleiman Halilu has disclosed that the Federal Government’s Irrigate Nigeria Project, amongst other things, targets increase in income of Nigeria’s farmers nationwide, even as the formal launch of the initiative took place at the weekend in Gamawa Local Government Area of Bauchi State.

Improved irrigation, according to NASENI EVC/CEO, “helps farmers to extend the number of farming rounds made possible in a year for each farming household. And this means a rise in income for farmers as farming activities increased all through the dry season”.

Speaking on Saturday 1st March 2025 in Gamawa, Bauchi State at the formal launch of the programme, the chief executive of NASENI said the goal of Irrigate Nigeria under the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Tinubu administration essentially includes the transformation of entire Nigeria’s agriculture sector through provision of sustainable irrigation systems that empower farmers to achieve year-round farming, and by extension increased productivity and reduced food prices.

He said amongst other things, the programme is jointly being implemented by NASENI and the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund (RHIDF) and also has the participation of private sector at the core of its operations and it’s in line with President Tinubu’s commitment to fully empower and enable Nigeria’s private sector with farmers to develop the Nigeria’s agricultural sector.

Beginning with this pilot phase, Halilu explained that the irrigate Nigeria Project kicked-off on a 10-hectare land in Gamawa Local Government of Bauchi State under the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) built on a large scale farming basis for the purpose of sustainability and more production.

According to Halilu “this Federal Government initiative rests on four components for its sustainability which include: first the deployment of centralized NASENI irrigation systems to support farming clusters in the participating communities, Second is the provision of input-enhanced seeds and fertilizers including technical support to the participating farmers to complement the provision of irrigation equipment, third is the specialized nature of the commercial model, aimed at ensuring commercial viability and long-term sustainability, and lastly Irrigate Nigeria Project will be run on commercial basis, but with every care taken to ensure that this does not burden the participating farmers unnecessarily”

To this end according to NASENI’s chief executive “the repayments by farmers for the support being provided will be in the form of convenient portions of their harvests, like rice paddy. These repayments will be pooled into a strategic food reserve that will help to stabilize commodity prices and also made available for institutional sale for export, and finally it has the objective of ensuring that Nigeria’s farmers are able to farm throughout the year regardless of the availability of rains while increasing the quantity and quality of harvests”

The Governor of the host state for kick off of the nationwide programme, Bauchi State, Alhaji Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed expressed gratitude to the Federal Government for choosing Gamawa Local Government Area, as the first state to benefit from irrigate Nigeria initiative.

He said “What the Federal Government is doing today in Gamawa is the fulfillment of the essence of governance, that is to create an enabling environment, and it is a plus for President Tinubu or the Federal government. This project is more than just about farming; it is about food security, economic empowerment, and national stability. It aligns perfectly with Bauchi State Government’s broader goals of expanding irrigation farming, reducing dependence on rain-fed agriculture, and promoting sustainable agricultural infrastructure”

According to Bauchi state Governor, the irrigate Nigeria initiative is a new Model for agricultural excellence, capable of leading to sustainable growth and development of the agricultural sector. “The Irrigate Nigeria Project, if implemented as designed, will have a multiplier effect across the agricultural value chain, both vertically and horizontally. It will drive knowledge transfer, introduce advanced technologies, and distribute wealth equitably ensuring that even the most vulnerable members of our society benefit from this transformation. This is the kind of structured agricultural intervention which Nigeria needs, one that prioritizes inclusivity, accountability, and long-term economic impact”, the Governor said.

Dr Mohammed Dahiru who is the Chairman Presidential Committee on Technology Transfer (PICTT) said at the occasion that the Irrigate Nigeria Project was designed essentially on the Public Private Partnership (PPP) model in order to sustain the initiative beyond its take off, and to make it run on business principles and yet not leaving the farm households nationwide behind  in the overall aim of developing the whole agriculture eco-system of the country.

He said unlike similar initiatives in the past which received funding 100 percent from government or development partners and yet failed, the Irrigate Nigeria project was conceived and funded at the outset extensively on PPP basis to drive sustainability.

According to Dahiru, “no private sector puts funds into any investment and allows it to fail or go to sleep. The private sector’s mindset primarily is that anything that is worth investing in must be nurtured to succeed, which is not always the case with fully government funded projects.”

The weekend’s take-off of the Irrigate Nigeria Project in Gamawa, Bauchi State is the first phase of the Launch. The exercise will be replicated in other parts of the country by NASENI under the auspices of the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund (RHIDF).

 

Fintrak, a foremost fintech firm in Nigeria, has introduced its innovative Credit Ratings Software, aimed at transforming how banks assess customers and creditors before granting loans. The software, leveraging advanced technology and data analytics, is designed to enhance credit risk management and streamline the lending process in Nigeria’s banking sector.

As a leading provider of fintech solutions, Fintrak continues to make a significant impact on Nigeria’s financial landscape. This introduction builds on the company’s reputation for delivering innovative solutions that optimize operational efficiency, mitigate risks, and promote financial inclusion.

The Credit Ratings Software is designed to help banks assess the financial health, risk profile, and repayment capacity of customers and corporate clients before making lending decisions. Integrating seamlessly with existing banking systems, the software provides real-time evaluations, ensuring loans are granted based on accurate and reliable data.

In a statement, Bimbo Abioye, Group Managing Director of Fintrak, emphasized the importance of this new product for the banking industry. “At Fintrak, we are dedicated to providing cutting-edge solutions that drive greater efficiency and sustainability for our clients. The introduction of our Credit Ratings Software marks a significant step forward for Nigeria’s banking sector. It empowers banks to make informed lending decisions, thereby reducing the risk of defaults and contributing to the long-term stability of the financial system,” Abioye explained.

He further elaborated on the software’s role in helping banks make data-driven decisions. “With the increasing demand for loans in Nigeria, it’s crucial for banks to have the right tools to assess risk accurately. Our software provides real-time credit evaluations, which will help banks minimize financial risk while ensuring that loans are granted to borrowers with the capacity to repay.”

The Credit Ratings Software offers several key benefits to banks, including providing an accurate credit risk assessment using advanced algorithms to evaluate borrowers’ creditworthiness. This helps banks understand potential risks more effectively and make better-informed decisions. The software also automates the credit evaluation process, enabling faster loan approvals without compromising quality, thereby improving the overall customer experience.

Additionally, the software significantly enhances financial risk management by allowing banks to identify potential risks early in the lending process, reducing the chances of defaults. It also ensures compliance with regulatory standards set by Nigeria’s financial authorities, including the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

A standout feature of the Fintrak Credit Ratings Software is its adaptability. The software is customizable to meet the unique needs of any bank, regardless of its size. Furthermore, it comes with bilingual capabilities in English and French, ensuring it serves the diverse banking market across Nigeria and ECOWAS Region.

Abioye highlighted the software’s broader importance in Nigeria’s rapidly evolving economic environment. “In today’s fast-paced financial landscape, banks must adopt tools that help them manage risk effectively while providing seamless services to their customers. Our software is built to meet these demands, and we believe it will have a significant impact on the long-term stability of Nigeria’s banking sector,” he said.

Fintrak, a leader in Nigeria’s fintech industry, continues to drive innovation with solutions that support banks in areas such as loan management, payments, and enterprise resource planning (ERP). The introduction of the Credit Ratings Software reinforces Fintrak’s commitment to equipping financial institutions with tools that improve their risk assessment and credit decision-making processes.

As Nigeria’s banking sector continues to modernize, Fintrak’s Credit Ratings Software is set to become an essential tool for banks looking to manage credit risk more effectively and contribute to the overall stability of the financial system.

 

 

 

The Credit Ratings Software offers several key benefits to banks, including providing an accurate credit risk assessment using advanced algorithms to evaluate borrowers’ creditworthiness. This helps banks understand potential risks more effectively and make better-informed decisions. The software also automates the credit evaluation process, enabling faster loan approvals without compromising quality, thereby improving the overall customer experience.

 

By Roberta Edu

As a feminist, entrepreneur, and tech expert, I have always advocated for women’s empowerment and equality. However, through my personal and professional experiences in Nigeria, I have observed a critical pattern—when it comes to success in business, politics, or life in general, strategic collaboration with men often yields more support and results than relying solely on women.

Many assume that my advocacy for women means I am against men, but the truth is, most of my key business relationships and life-changing connections have been with men. This is not to say that women do not support each other, but rather to highlight a deeper psychological and social conditioning that influences how women interact in competitive and professional spaces.

When I embark on a project, the first people I instinctively reach out to are often a mix of men and women—yet, the ratio tends to favor men. In my experience, once you set aside the extremely misogynistic men, more men are likely to support a woman’s growth than an average woman would. This is not a matter of personal rivalry but a systemic issue. African women, having been historically conditioned to look up to men for leadership and validation, often unconsciously undermine their own gender.

This mindset is deeply ingrained. Many women, even those in positions of influence, tend to champion men over their fellow women, regardless of competence. It is a learned behavior, stemming from generations of systemic gender imbalance. While there are progressive women who actively uplift others, the percentage remains relatively small.

For women aiming to break barriers, this reality must be acknowledged, not with bitterness, but with strategy. Success requires allies, and in the current landscape, men often serve as more reliable supporters. Women in disruptive or leadership roles must ensure they have solid male allies in their corner—men who will stand by them, advocate for them, and offer steadfast support when needed.

This does not mean women are incapable of supporting each other, nor does it absolve men of their role in perpetuating gender inequality. Instead, it underscores the need for women to be intentional about fostering genuine alliances while continuing to challenge and change the narratives that hinder collective female progress.

A clear example of this disparity is evident in social discourse. If I were to be criticized online today, it is likely that men, even those who regularly debate my views, would engage in a more structured and measured argument. Meanwhile, some women, who may have never engaged with my content before, might resort to outright dismissal or discrediting. This is not personal; it is simply a reflection of the broader inequality effect.

As we work towards closing the gender gap, women must recognize these systemic influences and actively work to dismantle them. By supporting each other more intentionally and challenging ingrained biases, we can create a more balanced and empowering environment for all. Until then, strategic collaboration remains key to success in today’s world.

In a deeply moving and thought-provoking sermon on Sunday, Rev. Fred Obetoh challenged his congregation with a crucial question: “Where do you belong?” His message, based on Joshua 24:14-15, urged believers to examine their spiritual allegiance, emphasizing that neutrality has no place in the Kingdom of God.

“If you’re neither here nor there, you don’t belong anywhere,” he declared, urging Christians to take a firm stand in their faith. “Choose today whom you will serve. Are you on the Lord’s side?”

A Call to True Commitment

Rev. Obetoh emphasized that being a Christian is not just about attendance or association but about a deep, unwavering commitment to God. Citing 1 Corinthians 6:17, he reminded the congregation that “He that is joined to the Lord is of one spirit.” He warned against being distracted by the faults of others, stating that when one’s eyes are truly focused on God, they will not dwell on the shortcomings of those around them.

He further expounded on Romans 8:14-17, affirming that those who are led by the Spirit of God are His true children. “Your sense of belonging reveals your true identity. You must belong somewhere—there is no neutral ground in the spiritual journey,” he said, referencing Revelation 3:15, which warns against lukewarm faith.No photo description available.

 

“The harvest is plenty, but the laborers are few. Jesus needs people who are ready to work for Him,” he proclaimed. But he assured them that God never abandons those who choose Him. “You can’t choose God and be forsaken. When you commit yourself fully, He will guide and sustain you.”

Following Christ Wholeheartedly

Rev. Obetoh drew parallels between God’s unwavering claim over the Israelites (Exodus 3:7-9) and the call of Jesus to His disciples, stressing that true blessings come from following the Master. “Jesus called His disciples to follow Him, and in that obedience, they found purpose and reward,” he said.

Reflecting on the Acts 2:42-46 account of the early church, he urged believers to cultivate a strong sense of unity and belonging within the body of Christ. “The early Christians shared everything, worshipped together, and stood firm in their faith. Their example teaches us what true devotion looks like.”

God’s Work Needs Laborers

Rev. Obetoh reminded the congregation that God is actively seeking laborers for His kingdom. “The harvest is plenty, but the laborers are few. Jesus needs people who are ready to work for Him,” he proclaimed. But he assured them that God never abandons those who choose Him. “You can’t choose God and be forsaken. When you commit yourself fully, He will guide and sustain you.”

Encouraging everyone to embrace their calling, he reaffirmed Jesus’ promise that “God will build His church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

A Prayer of Liberation and Blessing

Rev. Obetoh concluded the service with a powerful prayer of deliverance, speaking faith and victory over the lives of his listeners:

“Whatever evil has been done against you, I cancel it with the blood of Jesus. You are freed in Jesus’ name!”

The message left the congregation in deep reflection, reinforcing the urgency of standing firm in faith and fully committing to God’s work. Many were visibly moved, as the sermon served as a wake-up call to examine their spiritual walk and make a decisive commitment to serve God wholeheartedly.

  •  

  • Popular social media personality Very Dark Man, an Edo-born influencer known for his controversial takes on social issues, has ignited a heated debate after calling on Igbos to stage a protest over the revelations in a newly published book. His call has been met with widespread backlash, with many accusing him of opportunism, clout-chasing, and a lack of genuine concern for Igbo struggles.

    The controversy erupted after Very Dark Man released a video urging Igbos to take to the streets in response to the book’s findings, which he claimed warranted mass action. However, many within the Igbo community dismissed his call as reckless and uninformed, arguing that such a protest could lead to severe consequences given the current state of security in the South-East.

    Criticism Over Security Risks

    Opponents of Very Dark Man’s call for protest argue that the South-East remains one of the most militarized regions in Nigeria under the current APC-led government. Security forces are frequently deployed in the region, citing concerns over secessionist movements and insecurity. Critics warn that a public demonstration could easily escalate into a violent crackdown, giving security operatives an excuse to brand young Igbo protesters as anti-state actors.

    “Does he not understand the risks involved?” one critic asked. “Or is he just doing this for engagement on social media? If he truly cared about Igbos, he would know that the government has militarized our lands and would use any excuse to clamp down on our youth.”

    Another critic pointed out that Igbo activism must be strategic, not impulsive. “Marching in the streets is not always the answer. If you’re truly an advocate for the Igbo people, you should be pushing for political and economic empowerment, not setting up our youth to be brutalized.”

    Where Was This Energy During the 2023 Elections?

    Beyond security concerns, many have questioned Very Dark Man’s sudden interest in Igbo affairs, pointing out that he was largely silent when Igbos were harassed, brutalized, and even killed during the 2023 elections in Lagos.

    “Where was this sudden Igbo advocacy when our people were attacked at polling stations?” one person asked. “Why didn’t he make videos then? Why didn’t he call for protests when Igbo voters were disenfranchised? Now, all of a sudden, because it suits his narrative, he wants Igbos to take to the streets?”

    Many believe Very Dark Man has no real stake in Igbo struggles and is merely using the issue to gain attention and drive social media engagement.

    Lack of Credibility and Influence

    Several critics argue that Very Dark Man lacks the credibility and influence to mobilize the Igbo people. Unlike respected Igbo leaders and activists who have long championed the community’s cause, Very Dark Man is seen as an outsider with no deep understanding of Igbo history, culture, or struggles.

    “You cannot influence an Igbo man to do a peaceful walk; you do not have the range, the respect, or the credibility,” one comment read.

    Others accused him of being more focused on internet drama than real activism. “He thrives on ring lights and cheap clout,” another critic stated. “You press record and simultaneously turn off your brain.”

    Why Not Focus on Edo or Yoruba Issues?

    The debate has also sparked a wider conversation about ethnic activism in Nigeria. Many critics have questioned why Very Dark Man is so invested in Igbo affairs while neglecting issues within his own Edo community.

    “Instead of clout-chasing with Ndigbo, why don’t you focus on your people?” one critic asked. “Edo State has its own share of problems—kidnapping, bad roads, failed governance. Why not channel your energy into fixing that?”

    Others compared his sudden interest in Igbo matters to the lack of activism around Yoruba issues. “Why are you not mobilizing Yoruba people to protest the murder of MKO Abiola, a Yoruba man whose election was annulled by IBB? Why aren’t you pushing for justice there? Is it because you know they don’t rate you?”

    The Igbo Spirit of Resistance

    Some critics used the opportunity to highlight the resilience of the Igbo people, reminding Very Dark Man that Igbo struggles are not comparable to those of other ethnic groups in Nigeria.

    “In the history of Nigeria, show me where your people fought a three-year war against the Nigerian state and world powers,” one response stated. “Show me where they stood their ground like the Igbos did during the Biafra war. You can’t, because you and your ancestors do not have that kind of resilience.”

    The Bigger Question: Should Igbos Protest?

    Amidst the heated exchanges, the fundamental question remains: should Igbos heed Very Dark Man’s call and take to the streets? For many, the answer is a resounding no.

    While some acknowledge that the book’s revelations are troubling, they argue that Igbo activism must be calculated, not reactionary. Many believe that engaging in strategic political, economic, and intellectual battles is a more effective approach than protests that could lead to bloodshed.

    As the debate continues to rage, it is clear that the conversation around Igbo identity, political activism, and the role of social media influencers in shaping public discourse is far from over. However, one thing remains certain: Igbo struggles cannot be dictated by outsiders, especially those with no real stake in the community’s future.